The headline did not name a single hero. Instead, it pointed to a cluster of builders, executives, and researchers whose systems slipped fro...
Đề bài
The headline did not name a single hero. Instead, it pointed to a cluster of builders, executives, and researchers whose systems slipped from labs into daily life, from code assistants to image tools to chatbots that sit inside search, work, and school. In late 2025, TIME framed this moment as a turning point by choosing “The Architects of AI” as its Person of the Year, arguing that the impact was now too large to ignore and too fast to treat as a side story. In offices, the shift looks ordinary at first. A draft appears sooner. A summary arrives before the meeting ends. A customer reply is suggested while the agent is still reading. Yet the ordinary feel hides a deeper recalibration of effort: routine tasks shrink, review becomes constant, and the baseline for “good enough” rises. TIME and the Associated Press both described 2025 as the year AI’s potential “roared into view,” with no clean boundary between novelty and infrastructure, because the tools began to shape how people write, plan, decide, and even argue. [I] The most visible winners sit close to the compute and platform stack, where chips, data centers, and model access become gatekeeping assets. [II] Reporting around the TIME selection highlighted how a small set of leaders and firms now steer the pace of deployment, while the broader public negotiates side effects in real time, from job redesign to misinformation risk to energy demand. [III] The story is not only innovation but escalation: investment races, regulatory debates, and a widening gap between those who build the systems and those who must adapt to them. [IV] That is why the choice of a group matters. It pushes readers to infer that this era is not about one inventor, but about an ecosystem that rewards scale, speed, and narrative control. The “Architects” label invites a double reading: admiration for what was engineered, and scrutiny of what was normalised. Whether this becomes a legacy of productivity and discovery, or a case study in unmanaged disruption, depends less on awe and more on governance, literacy, and the slow work of aligning incentives with public interest. [Adapted from https://time.com/] Question 31: Where in the passage does the following sentence best fit? The same surge also concentrates power. A. [I] B. [II] C. [III] D. [IV] Question 32: The word “recalibration” in the passage is opposite in meaning to __________. A. certainty B. reliability C. stability D. routine Question 33: The word "it" in the first paragraph refers to __________. A. the headline B. a single hero C. a cluster D. a name Question 34: Which of the following is NOT mentioned as a place where AI chatbots can “sit inside”? Question 35: Which of the following best summarizes the main content of the second paragraph? A. The transition to AI in the workplace is largely superficial, as most employees still prefer manual methods for high-stakes decision-making and planning. B. While AI integration appears subtle, it fundamentally redefines productivity standards and blurs the line between new technology and essential infrastructure. C. Public figures and news agencies have reached a consensus that AI is now primarily used for routine tasks rather than complex problem-solving. D. The year 2025 marked the end of the novelty phase for AI, leading to a significant decrease in the human effort required for office administration. Question 36: The phrase "roared into view" in paragraph 2 is closest in meaning to __________. A. faded from attention B. returned to fashion C. became suddenly obvious D. grew steadily quieter Question 37: According to the third paragraph, what is a consequence of the current "escalation" in the AI field? A. The broader public has gained more control over how platforms manage data centers and chip production. B. There is an increasing disparity between those creating the technology and those forced to adjust to it. C. Regulatory debates have successfully bridged the gap between model access and the energy demands of firms. D. Investment races have shifted the focus from platform stacks to the reduction of misinformation risks globally. Question 38: Which of the following best paraphrases the underlined sentence in paragraph 4? A. The future of AI will be defined by scientific breakthroughs and public amazement rather than the regulatory efforts of various global governments. B. AI will likely result in unmanaged disruption unless scientists can find a way to make the technology more impressive to the general public. C. The ultimate impact of AI rests on administrative oversight and societal understanding rather than simply being fascinated by the technology itself. D. If incentives are not immediately aligned with public interest, the legacy of AI will be entirely focused on discovery instead of social disruption. Question 39: Which of the following can most likely be inferred from the passage? A. TIME magazine’s choice of "The Architects of AI" was intended to celebrate a single inventor who revolutionized code assistants. B. True power in the AI era is held by those who control the underlying physical and technical foundations of the models. C. The transition of AI from labs to daily life has completely eliminated the risks associated with misinformation in schools. D. The baseline for "good enough" in office work has risen so high that routine tasks have been entirely removed from job descriptions. Question 40: Which of the following best summarizes the passage? A. The evolution of AI from laboratory experiments to daily life has primarily benefited the broader public by simplifying all routine office tasks and planning. B. TIME’s Person of the Year selection highlights the individual heroes who have successfully managed to balance energy demand with innovative AI deployment. C. AI has evolved into a pervasive infrastructure that shifts power to developers and requires proactive societal management to ensure a beneficial future. D. The architectural label given to AI researchers suggests that the technology is now a fixed backdrop that no longer requires scrutiny or regulatory debate. |